By the time a utility or its construction partners are rebuilding damaged infrastructure, the decisions that mattered most were already made months or years earlier, or they weren’t made at all. The companies executing distribution work are accountable for the results either way.
What Waiting Actually Costs
In its first comprehensive analysis of power outage costs, Oak Ridge National Laboratory found that major outages increased 29% between 2018 and 2024 across the US, eclipsing 6,500 events, while the average outage stretched from 9.6 hours to 11.8 hours. Customer costs grew proportionally, averaging $67 billion a year over that period and hit $121 billion in 2024 alone.
The American Society of Civil Engineers' (ASCE) 2025 Infrastructure Report Card translates that increase into a grade. They determined that the energy sector dropped to a D+ from a C- in 2021, a rare downgrade in a report card where most categories improved. ASCE reasoned that transformer shortages, rising severe weather, and thinning transmission capacity were the primary drivers. They build for years in the background before an extreme weather event brings them to the surface.
For construction companies working distribution programs, the risk is in the gap between where the known risks are and where the funding has been allocated. A feeder segment flagged as high-risk in an internal assessment that has not been incorporated into an approved capital plan is a failure risk that can be tied to the on-duty crew.
State Regulators Are Making a Move
To avoid this gap widening, a growing number of state regulatory bodies are aiming to getting ahead of failing infrastructure. In fact, twenty states have adopted requirements for regulated electric utilities to file distribution system plans for regulatory and stakeholder review as of late 2024. These plans cover asset features like reliability, distributed energy resources (DER) integration, and grid modernization. The typical structure runs a 5-10-year capital planning horizon, with solutions and cost estimates refreshed every one to three years.
That timescale is significant for contractors bidding and executing this work. A utility operating under an integrated distribution plan isn't changing scope reactively after a strong storm season. It is working from a timeframe that construction partners can plan crews, equipment, and material orders against. The caveat is that the contractor must anticipate starting before a project is released when beginning capacity planning.
The Asset Data Must Feed the Plan
For proactive asset planning to work in practice, planning cycles need to receive accurate condition data in time to implement. Distribution transformers provide a clear example of the benefit of this shift. 55% of in-service distribution transformers are already older than 33 years, against a design life of roughly 30 to 40 years. A utility making replacement decisions based on nameplate age alone does not account for condition, risk, and asset criticality. This can conflict with the limiting failure point of the actual grid.
A contractor who can only report what was installed at closeout is a vendor executing a scope. Conversely, one who can show a utility's planning team the actual condition of an asset before replacement contributes meaningful information to the next capital cycle's risk assessment. Providing that level of insight changes the relationship from a transactional to a strategic one, and increases the chances of the contractor contributing to the 5-10-year plan.
Planning Ahead Provides Strategic Positioning
System planning that waits for the next outage is planning that has already failed at its core purpose. The utilities moving fastest are treating distribution planning as a continuous cycle fed by real condition data, not an emergency response triggered by the last failure. Construction companies that align their own capital, workforce, and asset data practices to be proactive are the ones utilities will keep in their shortlist.
For fresh insights into the utility industry, along with trends, challenges, and shifts shaping utility work, subscribe to the Utility Expo Newsletter.
